The dismay and frustration at least some PS3 owners likely experienced when Sony made
the decision to limit access to the PSN service to those who were willing to disable the Other OS
feature on their machines was no doubt genuine and understandable. As a matter of providing
customer satisfaction and building loyalty, it may have been questionable. As a legal matter,
however, plaintiffs have failed to allege facts or to articulate a theory on which Sony may be held
liable. The motion to dismiss is granted, without leave to amend. The motion to strike is denied as
moot. A separate judgment will issue.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: 12/8/11
RICHARD SEEBORG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
the decision to limit access to the PSN service to those who were willing to disable the Other OS
feature on their machines was no doubt genuine and understandable. As a matter of providing
customer satisfaction and building loyalty, it may have been questionable. As a legal matter,
however, plaintiffs have failed to allege facts or to articulate a theory on which Sony may be held
liable. The motion to dismiss is granted, without leave to amend. The motion to strike is denied as
moot. A separate judgment will issue.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: 12/8/11
RICHARD SEEBORG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
ليست هناك تعليقات:
إرسال تعليق